The Gay Marriage debate raises serious questions in regard to the profound effect this change might have on our modern society. Like all changes in the modern era, there is no historical precedent and as such can only be classed as social engineering without due regard to any unintended consequences. I personally believe that in a pluralistic society that some legal recognition of a gay union should be allowed, but not at the expense of the long and ancient tradition of marriage.
Therefore, here are some relevant arguments on this issue to consider..
- Marriage is a unique relationship between one man and one woman.
- Marriage is the foundation of family, which in turn is the foundation of society.
- If marriage can be redefined to include two people of the same gender, why not three or more people?
- Marriage is deeply valued by a large proportion of the population for cultural and religious reasons and this should be respected.
- Redefining marriage has potential serious consequences for religious freedom and freedom of conscience.
- Same-sex marriage sets up a new family model that trashes the truth that gender is vital to a child in family formation.
- Research shows that a child with married, biological mother and father do best.
- Children should be given the chance to start life with both their biological parents.
Neil Stott